Excerpts and impressions concerning Miami's Urban Development Boundary [UDB], the city and the Everglades...

The Urban Development Boundary is, in theory, a very strong unrelenting force separating nature and man-made development. The unique feature of this boundary is that it is completely traversable, as well as, invisible. At no point along the line is there a physical barrier of any kind. It is the type of limit that can only be felt through experience.
The intent of UDB is to contain development, protect the Everglades, and provide a seamless transition between the two. However, as population increases due to the allure of city life, urban development encroaches ever closer to the preconceived perimeter. This expansion is beginning to make the transition less subtle and much more tangible. With the continuation of this trend, the boundary will give the appearance of a rubber band attempting to constrict a rebellious volume of urban expansion.
This influx has made some developers believe the best solution is to, once again, move the line further into the Everglades. This would allow high density residential and community properties to be built pass the current line to alleviate the lack of available housing. However, this proposal stirs up questions such as: why implement a boundary on urban development if it will constantly give way when more development is proposed?
This question has brought about a debate throughout the community on whether to hold the line or make away for expansion. With valid arguments on both sides it becomes a choice between building new structures for human inhabitants or preserving what is there for the natural inhabitants."
-Meredith Lambert, Kevin Banagon, Luis Jimenez, Thiago Menezes
---

"The Urban Development Boundary designates a division mediated by man to control sprawl and challenge existing infrastructure to revitalize itself within its present area. Only an imaginary curtain prevents intersection of these independent subjects. This area is formed to offer better alternatives, where the line regulates access and interjection. The irregular line sets back the Everglades and other natural reserves from the developed area. Not only does this boundary give protection to future sprawl, it acts as a division line between the metropolis/suburban and areas that need to be restricted from further destruction.
Although this line is a more practical solution to manage continuing growth, compared to other areas, Miami is still within a predicament. The lower South Florida region is squeezed between two natural barriers (ocean, and everglades) initiating a point of uncertainty. This shell leaves man to design new ways to proceed forward without hurting more of the reserves. Alone, the destruction is devastating to the land, but eventually it becomes economically devastating to the developed areas. Following this guideline, South Florida’s landscape is proposed to become a starting and ending point with this boundary, changing only rarely and practically with growing pressure."
-Cecilia Hernández, Gerry Cabrera, Monica Chirinos, Brennan Baxley
-----
"Boundary, by definition, is set to be something whether physical or not, to divide or set a separation between two realms. It can be the beginning of something as well as the termination of another. As part of our analysis of the Urban Development Boundary, we have acknowledged that this boundary, though imaginary, is noticeable to those in the State of Florida. We can clearly see that two realms are being kept apart from each other, one being the Everglades and the other being the City.
The goal that was set for the Urban Development Boundary was to keep a control of the environmental impact on the everglades from having people build within its proximity. As part of our analysis, our group developed a concern of whether or not extending the Urban Development Boundary in the western part of Miami-Dade County is necessary. Who really benefits from this? Was there an [effective] boundary ever set at all?
...our analysis makes us to believe that a movable a boundary, that is supposed to control these two realms from intertwining with each other, is that their never was ever boundary set at all."
-Andres Pineda, Ricky Hernández, Alex Pérez, Joel Corbea
-----
"Over the years the urban boundary line has been moved constantly for what developers call “low income housing” when in reality it is anything but low income. As a result of the construction it has slowly impeded into the boundaries of what was the everglades and its natural habitats. The urban boundary line is clearly visible. It can be seen throughout Florida. Along SW 8th Street towards the Everglades, new developments are bein created amongst forests of melaleuca trees.
Population growth has been used as an excuse for the expansion of the boundary line. Such groups as the Lennar Corp have been buying out areas beyond the boundary line for speculation. As a result more people are also buying outside of the boundary line in hope of investing in a higher land value. This is conflicting with ongoing efforts to restore the Everglades such as the Everglades Restoration Plan. Amendments are only considered every odd year. Despite submissions of plans to the county and South Florida Regional Planning Council, developers continue to build outside the boundary line.
Through our research we have found that the root of the constantly changing boundary line resulted from politics and money related issues. This is not a modern problem; but a problem that started since the earliest development of the state of Florida. Despite state legislations to save and protect the everglades, the boundary line continues to move."
-Devin Cejas, Sefora Chavarria, Daniella Motro, Ashley Pumares
-----
"The Miami Urban Development Boundary (UDB), located between Everglades National Park and Biscayne Bay National
Park, was created to distinguish the area where urban development may occur from areas that it should not occur. Since its first denotation on the Land Use Plan, several means of fulfillment have been created to ensure the UDB’s continued survival.
Some of the strategies in place to support the current boundary include emphasizing concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity, requiring all new development and redevelopment along transit corridors to be planned and designed to promote pedestrian and transit use, revising development regulations to provide density bonus for strategic design within certain zoning districts, allowing for mix of housing types, promoting energy conservation and adaptive redevelopment, adopting financial and regulatory incentives for infill and redevelopment opportunities, and developing specific strategies to promote infill within targeted urban areas.
The UDB has successfully allowed for the containment of development and has created opportunities for future transit corridors and infill developments. The Miami Dade County has also benefited from the UDB due to the increased direction of public service and investment within the boundary, the maintenance of agricultural areas for farming, and protection of environmentally sensitive areas and wetlands from urban encroachment. With the increased neighborhood support to maintain the boundary, there is great potential for increased density in eastern areas. The Miami Urban Development Boundary has continued to accomplish its goal in organizing and controlling urbanism."
-Chelsi Rome, José Fonseca, Chris Garcia